Welcome our blog: Complete Guide to Supply Chain ESG Risk Identification and Assessment | Systematic Approaches and Practical Tools

Table of Contents

GLEC - Carbon emission measurement specialist in logistics & transportation industry.

Starting Point for Effective ESG Risk Management {introduction}

Following Sun Tzu's principle of "know your enemy and know yourself," effective ESG risk management begins with accurate situational assessment. According to McKinsey research, systematic risk identification and assessment can reduce supply chain disruption risks by over 40% and cut related costs by 15-25% annually.

Why Systematic Approaches are Essential

Limitations of Traditional Approaches

Reactive response: Post-incident damage control focus
Fragmented management: Individual departmental responses lacking consistency
Surface-level inspections: Focus only on Tier 1 suppliers, ignoring deeper supply chains

Advantages of Systematic Approaches

Proactive prevention: Early risk detection and prevention
Integrated perspective: Comprehensive management spanning entire supply chains
Data-driven decisions: Rational judgments through objective indicators

Step 1: Supply Chain Mapping - Creating the Big Picture {supply-chain-mapping}

Importance of Supply Chain Visibility

Many companies know their direct suppliers (Tier 1) well but fail to understand Tier 2 and 3 suppliers. However, serious ESG risks often originate from deeper supply chain levels.

Current Supply Chain Visibility Status (Global Survey Results)

Tier 1 visibility: 95% of companies have coverage
Tier 2 visibility: Only 35% of companies have coverage
Tier 3 and below: Only 15% of companies have partial coverage

4-Step Supply Chain Mapping Process

Step 1: Core Product/Service Selection

Selection Criteria and Priorities

Revenue Contribution: Prioritize top 80% product lines
ESG Risk Level: Product lines with expected high risks
Brand Impact: Product lines critical to corporate image
Regulatory Coverage: Products subject to relevant regulations

Real Case: Apple's Product-Specific Supply Chain Management

iPhone (Top Priority)
- Revenue contribution: Over 50% of total revenue
- Number of suppliers: Over 200
- Management depth: Tracking to Tier 5

MacBook (Important Management)
- Revenue contribution: 20% of total revenue
- Number of suppliers: 150
- Management depth: Tracking to Tier 3

Step 2: Supplier Hierarchy Structure Understanding

Tier System Classification

Tier 1: Direct suppliers (Primary Suppliers)
- Final product assembly and completion
- Direct contractual relationships
- Quality and delivery responsibility
Tier 2: Suppliers to Tier 1 (Secondary Suppliers)
- Major component and material supply
- Indirect but important relationships
- Specialized technology and special material holders
Tier 3 and below: Raw material and basic material suppliers
- Raw material extraction and basic processing
- Highest ESG risk holders
- Lowest traceability

Step 3: Geographic Location and Scale Assessment

Key Information to Collect

Location Information: Country, region, specific address
Facility Scale: Production capacity, employee count, site area
Business Status: Revenue scale, market share, financial condition
Dependency Analysis: Revenue dependency on our company

Step 4: Product/Service Flow Mapping

Understanding Entire Value Chain Flow

Raw Material Extraction/Cultivation → Primary Processing → Component Manufacturing → Assembly → Distribution → End Consumption
        (Tier 4-5)                    (Tier 3)           (Tier 2)            (Tier 1)   (Company)    (Customer)

Supply Chain Mapping Tools and Technologies

Traditional Methods

Supplier surveys
Contract and procurement data analysis
Site visits and interviews

Digital Tool Utilization

Supply Chain Management Software: SAP Ariba, Oracle SCM
Data Analytics Platforms: Palantir, Llamasoft
Blockchain Tracking: IBM Food Trust, VeChain

Step 2: Supplier Classification and Prioritization {supplier-classification}

Risk-Based Classification System

Managing all suppliers at the same level is inefficient and practically impossible. Systematic classification based on strategic importance and ESG risk levels is necessary.

Supplier Classification Matrix

ESG Risk Level	High Strategic Importance	Low Strategic Importance
High	Critical (Intensive Management)	Monitor (Regular Inspection)
Low	Strategic (Partnership)	Routine (Basic Management)

Critical Supplier Characteristics

Revenue Impact: Serious revenue loss expected if disrupted
Difficulty to Replace: Lack of alternative suppliers due to technical specialization
High-Risk Regions: Areas with political instability, serious environmental issues
Past History: Previous ESG issue experience

Strategic Supplier Characteristics

Technology Partnership: Joint R&D or innovation collaboration
Long-term Contracts: Supply contracts of 3+ years
Quality Excellence: Industry-leading quality assurance
ESG Leadership: Industry ESG best practice holders

Country/Regional Risk Assessment

High-Risk Region Identification Criteria

Political Stability Indicators

Political Stability Index (World Bank)
Corruption Perceptions Index (Transparency International)
Rule of Law Index (World Justice Project)

Social Risk Indicators

Human Development Index (UNDP)
Labor Rights Protection Level (ILO)
Gender Inequality Index (UNDP)

Environmental Risk Indicators

Environmental Performance Index (Yale University)
Climate Change Vulnerability Index
Natural Disaster Risk Level

Real Case: Samsung Electronics' Regional Risk Management

High-Risk Region Management System

Bangladesh (High Risk)
- Monthly on-site inspections
- Third-party audits 4 times annually
- 24-hour monitoring system

Vietnam (Medium-High Risk)  
- Quarterly on-site checks
- Third-party audits twice annually
- Weekly report requirements

South Korea (Low Risk)
- Annual regular audits
- Trust in self-inspection systems
- Intervention only for exceptional issues

Step 3: Due Diligence Execution {due-diligence}

Document-Based Preliminary Review

Essential Document Verification Checklist

Basic Certifications and Permits

[ ] Business registration and corporate registry
[ ] Industry-specific mandatory licenses (manufacturing permits, environmental permits, etc.)
[ ] Tax filing confirmations (past 3 years)
[ ] Labor Standards Act compliance certificates

ESG-Related Certifications

[ ] ISO 14001 (Environmental Management System)
[ ] ISO 45001 (Occupational Health and Safety Management System)
[ ] SA8000 (Social Accountability Certification)
[ ] FSC/PEFC (Sustainable Forest Certification)

Financial and Management Information

[ ] Audit reports for past 3 years
[ ] Balance sheets and income statements
[ ] Cash flow statements
[ ] Major customers and revenue composition

ESG Performance Data

[ ] Greenhouse gas emission reports
[ ] Waste treatment status and recycling rates
[ ] Industrial accident occurrence status
[ ] Employee satisfaction survey results

Red Flag Indicators (Immediate Attention Required)

Financial Red Flags

3 consecutive years of losses or sharp revenue decline
Debt ratio over 200%
Operating fund shortage due to cash flow problems

Legal Red Flags

Labor authority sanctions in past 2 years
Ministry of Environment violations and fine history
Ongoing class action lawsuits

ESG Red Flags

ESG-related negative media coverage
Inclusion in NGO criticism target company lists
Major customer transaction termination history

Key Points of On-Site Inspections

Pre-Inspection Preparations

Inspection Team Composition

Team Leader: ESG expert or procurement manager
Environmental Expert: Environmental engineering or related field specialist
Social Expert: Labor or HR management specialist
Governance Expert: Legal or audit manager

Inspection Tool Preparation

Industry-specific specialized checklists
Questionnaires translated into local languages
Photo/video recording equipment
Environmental measurement equipment (if needed)

On-Site Inspection Checklist

Environmental Sector Inspection Items

[ ] Wastewater Treatment Facilities: Operating status, treatment capacity, emission standard compliance
[ ] Air Pollution Prevention Facilities: Dust collectors, scrubbers, and other equipment inspection
[ ] Waste Management: Proper separation, waste disposal company selection
[ ] Chemical Storage: MSDS availability, safe storage facilities
[ ] Energy Management: Usage monitoring, conservation efforts

Social Sector Inspection Items

[ ] Labor Contracts: Written contract preparation, wage payment transparency
[ ] Working Environment: Lighting, ventilation, noise levels, and other working conditions
[ ] Safety Facilities: Emergency exits, fire extinguishers, personal protective equipment
[ ] Welfare Benefits: Rest rooms, dormitories, cafeterias, and other facility conditions
[ ] Training and Education: Safety training, technical training implementation status

Governance Sector Inspection Items

[ ] Internal Controls: Work processes, approval systems, document management
[ ] Compliance: Regulatory compliance checklists, training records
[ ] Subcontracting Management: Re-subcontracting status, fair trade compliance
[ ] Information Security: Personal information protection, technical data management
[ ] Ethical Management: Code of conduct, reporting system operation

Stakeholder Interview Techniques

Worker Interview Guidelines

Interview Environment Setup

Individual interviews conducted without managers present
Anonymity guarantee and anti-retaliation assurance
Comfortable atmosphere creation (separate space secured)
Interviewers capable of local language communication

Key Question Areas

Working Conditions
- What are your actual working hours?
- Are overtime payments properly paid?
- Are there restrictions on vacation usage?

Safety and Health
- Have you experienced workplace accidents?
- Are personal protective equipment adequately provided?
- Can you receive appropriate treatment for health issues?

Company Policies
- Are you aware of the company's grievance procedures?
- Have you ever used internal reporting systems?
- Do you feel safe reporting problems?

Community Dialogue

Local Community Impact Assessment

Environmental impact resident opinion collection
Employment creation and local economic contribution evaluation
Social contribution activities and community relationships
Communication status with NGOs and civic groups

Step 4: Smart Monitoring with Digital Technology {#digital-monitoring}

Satellite Data Utilization

Deforestation Monitoring NASA satellite data can be used to monitor deforestation in palm oil and soy plantations in real-time.

Real Case: Unilever's Satellite Monitoring Unilever monitors palm oil supplier farms via satellite to achieve deforestation-free sourcing.

AI and Big Data Analytics

Social Media Monitoring AI can analyze supplier-related online news and social media posts in real-time to detect ESG issues early.

Predictive Analytics Based on historical data, it's possible to predict risk occurrence probability for proactive response.

Blockchain-Based Tracking Systems

Raw Material Tracking Blockchain technology enables transparent tracking from raw material origins to final products.

Real Case: Walmart's Food Tracking System Walmart built a blockchain-based food tracking system in collaboration with IBM. Food poisoning sources can be traced within seconds.

Step 5: Third-Party Assessment Strategy {#third-party-assessment}

Major ESG Assessment Organizations

EcoVadis

Evaluates 90,000 companies worldwide
Assessment based on 21 ESG criteria, 4 themes
Provides Bronze, Silver, Gold, Platinum ratings

Sedex

Social responsibility-focused assessment
SMETA (Sedex Members Ethical Trade Audit) audit program
55,000 member companies

CDP (Carbon Disclosure Project)

Climate change response-focused assessment
8-level assessment from A to D-
13,000 companies participate annually

Third-Party Assessment Utilization Strategy

Advantages

Securing expertise and objectivity
International credibility and comparability
Benchmarking data provision
High supplier acceptance

Limitations

Cost burden and time consumption
Limited industry-specific characteristic reflection
Quantitative indicator-focused assessment
On-site inspection limitations

Step 6: Risk Indicator Design {#risk-indicators}

Quantitative Indicator Design

Environmental Indicators

Greenhouse gas emissions (tCO2eq/revenue)
Energy consumption (MWh/production)
Water usage (㎥/production)
Waste generation (tons/production)
Recycling rate (%)

Social Indicators

Industrial accident rate (incidents/total working hours)
Employee turnover rate (%)
Training hours (hours/person)
Female manager ratio (%)
Local employment rate (%)

Governance Indicators

Compliance violation cases
Internal audit frequency
Corruption report cases
Board independence index
Information disclosure transparency score

Qualitative Indicator Design

5-Point Scale Assessment Criteria

5 points: Industry-leading policies and systems
4 points: Excellent management system operation
3 points: Basic requirement fulfillment
2 points: Partial improvement needed
1 point: Serious level requiring immediate improvement

Comprehensive Scoring Method

Weighted Average Method

Environment (E): 40%, Social (S): 40%, Governance (G): 20%
Weights adjustable based on industry characteristics
Differential weighting based on risk levels

Grade Classification

A Grade (90-100 points): Excellent partner
B Grade (80-89 points): Good level
C Grade (70-79 points): Improvement recommended
D Grade (60-69 points): Immediate improvement needed
F Grade (Below 60 points): Consider transaction suspension

Practical Tips and Annual Planning {#practical-tips}

Annual Supplier ESG Assessment Plan

Q1: Intensive assessment of Critical suppliers
Q2: Basic assessment of Strategic suppliers
Q3: Document-based assessment of Monitor suppliers
Q4: Overall result analysis and improvement planning

Assessment Result Utilization

Excellent suppliers: Long-term contracts and volume expansion
Average suppliers: Improvement planning and support
Poor suppliers: Improvement deadline setting and monitoring
Lowest suppliers: Transaction suspension or gradual reduction

Key Terms Glossary {#terms}

Supply Chain Visibility The degree to which the structure and flow of the entire supply chain can be transparently understood

Due Diligence Systematic investigation and assessment process of suppliers' ESG risks

Scoring Model Model for quantitatively evaluating suppliers by integrating various ESG indicators

Conclusion and Next Steps {#conclusion}

Effective ESG risk identification and assessment requires appropriate combination of various methodologies and tools. The key is finding the optimal combination suited to our company's situation and capabilities. In our next edition, we will cover how to establish and execute actual management strategies based on identified risks. We will present specific implementation plans that can be immediately applied in practice, from organizational structure to supplier management and monitoring systems.

Related Tags: #SupplyChainDueDiligence #ESGAssessment #RiskManagement #SupplierEvaluation #Sustainability #DueDiligence #SupplyChainManagement #ESGMonitoring #RiskMitigation #SupplierManagement

For carbon emission measurement and consultation support, please visit our website: https://glec.io/

Complete Guide to Supply Chain ESG Risk Identification and Assessment | Systematic Approaches and Practical Tools